Student's pen: Overview: Justice in Ancient Rome

INTRODUCTION:

The justice system of Ancient Rome is one of the most influential and well-advanced legal frameworks that have formed the foundation for many modern legal principles. Roman law went through centuries of development, from the Twelve Tables of 451–450 BCE, which covered a codification of customary laws, to a much more complex system later on, trying to strike a balance between the power of the state and individual rights. The judicature of Rome was a combination of statutory laws, precedents, and interpretations by magistrates that made the juridical process flexible and influential in shaping Western legal traditions. [1]

The criminal justice system in Ancient Rome was primarily designed to maintain social order and uphold state authority. It consisted of a tiered judicial structure, including magistrates, juries, and legal experts who played crucial roles in legal proceedings. Roman courts handled civil and criminal matters, with different legal bodies responsible for various cases. While Roman law was characterized by procedural fairness, punishments were often severe, reflecting the state's interest in deterrence and control. The judiciary, though evolving, operated under significant influence from political figures, with trials often serving as arenas for social and political maneuvering. [2]

OBJECTIVES:

1. To analyse the structure and functioning of the Ancient Roman Judicial System.
2. To analyse the elements of criminal justice, from legal proceedings to punishments.
3. To understand how magistrates, juries, and legal experts have contributed to the administration of justice.
4. To compare ancient Roman principles with modern-day legal systems.
5. To understand the strengths and weaknesses in the Roman system of justice.

ANALYSIS:

Judicial Structure and Legal Framework: Roman justice transformed extensively over centuries, evolving from an informal customary system into a well-defined legal structure. The first legal structure was the Twelve Tables, which formed a basis for Roman jurisprudence in defining laws involving property, contracts, family, and crimes. Although these laws were still primitive, they established the idea of equal treatment before the law for at least Roman citizens. Over time, Roman law evolved into three main branches: Ius Civile (civil law), Ius Gentium (law of nations), and Ius Honorarium (law introduced by magistrates to supplement civil law).

The judiciary consisted of several key officials, including Praetors, Consuls, and the Senate. The Praetors oversaw judicial proceedings and had discretionary power in interpreting laws. They issued edicts that later formed an essential part of Roman legal doctrine. The Senate played an advisory role in legal matters, particularly in cases involving treason or high-profile political offenses.

One of the distinctive features of Roman law is the use of legal professionals - jurists and advocates, to give opinions and plead cases on behalf of clients. Unlike modern legal systems, however, there was no formalized legal profession, and influential patrons or senators often made the representation in court. [3]

Criminal Justice System: The Roman criminal justice system was designed to keep public order and reinforce state power. Crimes were divided into public crimes, or crimina, and private wrongs, or delicta. Public crimes, which included treason, murder, and corruption, were prosecuted by the state, whereas private wrongs were settled by compensation or arbitration.

Roman trials varied according to the type of crime committed. For instance, there were inheritance and property disputes heard in the Centumviral Court, and the Quaestiones Perpetuae was a permanent court set up for crimes such as bribery, poisoning, and violence. Criminal trials were usually heard by a jury of Roman citizens who deliberated on cases brought before them by prosecutors and defence advocates. Verdicts were usually decided by majority vote.

Ancient Roman punishments varied widely, ranging from small fines and exile to actual severe penalties. Then there were the most serious crimes, like treason, met with damnatio memoriae or being crucified. Punishments for lower-class offenders tended to be severe compared to their elite counterparts, who could be allowed to go into voluntary exile to avoid excessively harsh sentences. The Roman emphasis on punishment, which included public executions and penal slavery, is evidence that deterrence is the key focus. [4]

The Role of Magistrates and Juries: Magistrates played a central role in Roman justice, acting as both judges and administrators. The Praetors Urbanus and Peregrinus were in charge of the disputes between citizens and foreigners, respectively. They had the power to interpret laws and shape legal precedents.

In Roman trials, juries consisted of citizens. However, juries often proved to be subject to political and social pressures. Under the Republic, for example, the selection method resulted in elite class dominance of high-profile cases with biased verdicts. Judicial reforms introduced by Emperor Augustus were a means to more balanced judgments where members of the equestrian class joined the juries.

One of the most famous legal principles was "Innocent until proven guilty," which provided a procedural safeguard for the accused. However, trials were often swayed by public opinion and political rivalries, leading to instances of judicial corruption and manipulation. [5]

Influence on Modern Legal System: Roman legal traditions have greatly influenced modern legal frameworks, especially in Europe and countries following civil law traditions. The idea of codification of law, jury trials, and contractual obligations can be traced back to Roman jurisprudence. Roman law also introduced principles of natural justice, such as the right to a fair trial and proportional punishment, which continue to shape contemporary judicial systems.

Although the Roman justice system contributed much, it had flaws, such as class-based discrimination in punishments and political interference in trials. Furthermore, the absence of an independent judiciary led to powerful elites often influencing the legal outcomes. [6]

CONCLUSION: The justice system of Ancient Rome was a pioneering legal framework that laid the foundation for many principles still in use today. Its structured approach to governance, use of magistrates, jury trials, and codified laws contributed to the stability of Roman society. However, the system was not without its flaws—judicial bias, class disparities, and political influence often undermined the fairness of legal proceedings. The comparison of Ancient Rome's legal framework with the modern judicial systems points out progress and continuity in the evolution of law. Many of the shortcomings of Rome have been addressed in contemporary legal systems through institutional safeguards and judicial independence, but the core principles of Roman law remain the foundation for modern governance, thereby underlining the timelessness of justice and legal order.

REFERENCES: [1] Peter G Stain & Maurice Alfred Miller, Britannica, Roman Law: Influence, Importance & Facts (Dec. 9, 2024), https://www.britannica.com/topic/Roman-law.

[2] Mark CartWright, WORLD HISTORY ENCYCLOPEDIA, Roman Law (Nov. 24, 2201), https://www.worldhistory.org/Roman_Law

[3] Andrew M Riggsby, Criminal Law, Roman., 19 Oxford Research Encyclopedias 2017 (9-10).

[4] Saru Matambanadzo, Law in the Ancient World, 4 Law in the Ancient Worlds 2017 (2023).

[5] Leanna Bablitz, Courts, Roman., 19 Oxford Research Encyclopedias 2018 (3-5)

[6] Leanna Bablitz, Courts, Roman., 19 Oxford Research Encyclopedias 2018 (7-8)

The author affirms that this article is an entirely original work, never before submitted for publication at any journal, blog or other publication avenue. Any unintentional resemblance to previously published material is purely coincidental. This article is intended solely for academic and scholarly discussion. The author takes personal responsibility for any potential infringement of intellectual property rights belonging to any individuals, organizations, governments, or institutions.