Overview: JUVENILE BE TREATED AS ADULTS

Profile of the Author: Aditi Dhamdhere of Modern Law College, Pune University.

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile Crime isn’t normally conceived in the child but it is to a great extent present in him as a result of the environmental factors that he is raised in, his silly activities, or just absence of order and appropriate training.

As Fredrick Douglass says: It is simpler to assemble solid youngsters than to fix broken men. The young are respected to be perhaps the best resource of a nation. If this population isn’t all around prepared the eventual fate of a nation would unquestionably not be extremely splendid. We all have to provide youngsters with a sound situation to contemplate and develop in. The most widely recognized explanation behind a youngster to conflict with the law is either absence of training or faults in their childhood that is because of unfortunate social conditions bringing about the child to turn out to be truly and intellectually ill-suited just as an irresponsible citizen. Reasonable and comparable possibilities must be given to all adolescents to decrease awkwardness and assurance inculcating social value in the nation. Children are relied upon to be devoted, aware, and have great virtue. Nonetheless, because of specific conditions, a few youngsters can’t follow the set social and lawful announcement. These youngsters regularly engage in criminal conduct which is known as Juvenile Delinquency or Juvenile Crime [i].

JUVENILES BE TREATED AS ADULTS

This is a disputable subject dependent on the way that most adolescents are crashed into certain wrongdoings by peer pressure. It should depend upon the gravity of the crime committed; juveniles should be tried as adults if the crimes that they have carried out are heinous. Everyone makes a mistake be it a teenager. However, regardless of how old one is, murder or rape are not the crimes that are committed without the culprit putting thought into it. Any teenager who torments and slaughters an individual or commits rape which is heinous and grave in nature crime ought not to be treated as a child. There should be no excuse for teenagers who carry out crimes that break the law, they should not be allowed to live a normal life otherwise they will keep on committing the crimes. They must be punished by law [ii].

There are many reasons for juvenile delinquency such as family background, financial condition, a trend of alcoholism, peer pressure, film and social media, etc., [iii].

In the case of Mukesh and Ors. v. State of Delhi known as the “Delhi Gang Rape” case, an adolescent, who was few months less to 18 years have been condemned to 3 years custodial sentence, notwithstanding, it was said that he was the active member in the assault. People were outraged due to this and it was contended that there is a need to amend the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2000.

In another case of Sanjay Suri v. Delhi Administration, [iv] the Supreme Court ordered the arrival of adolescent undertrial detainees. The judgment additionally featured that the prison specialists will not acknowledge the age of the adolescent until and except if the age is explicitly referenced in the reports supporting confinement.

In the case of Jayendra v. State of UP, [v] the High Court ordered sending a youngster to detainment for committing an offence was challenged before the Supreme Court and the reports submitted by the medical authorities proved the age of the youngster, the sentence for detainment was suppressed and the convict was released immediately.

In another case of Munna v. State of UP, [vi] the Supreme Court held that regardless of whether a youngster is seen as an offender he ought not to be abused. They ought not to bolt up their fundamental rights when they enter prison.

In the case of Bhoop Ram v. State of UP, [vii] the Supreme Court followed the decision of Jayendra v. State of UP and it was held that the hour of the commission of an offence is adequate to decide the age of an individual.

In the case of Raj Singh v. State of Haryana, [viii] the Supreme Court held that the age of the child must be resolved at the hour of the event of an offence.

VARIOUS PROVISIONS UNDER LAWS IN INDIA

Constitutional Provisions

Article 15(3) [ix] gives the state power to make certain laws for women and children. Article 39(f) [x] stipulates that the children should be given chances and they should be ensured against misuse and good and material relinquishment.

Indian Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPc) Provisions

Section 82 [xi] of the Indian Penal Code provides that nothing is an offence that is committed by a child less than 7 years of age. Below the age of 7 years, no newborn child can be blamed for a crime. Section 83 [xii] provides an act of a child over 7 and under the age of 12 who has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequences of his conduct. Section 27 [xiii] of CrPc provides that any individual who at the date of appearing before the court is under 16 years old isn’t culpable with death or detainment forever.

Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection) Act, 2000 & 2015

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act was passed in 2000. The principal target of the new Act was to guarantee that no child up to the age of 18 years is held up in prison. The Act additionally made arrangements for the foundation and care, assurance, and recovery of children. It empowers the Juvenile Justice Board (prior called Juvenile Court) in adopting a multi-disciplinary strategy when conducting an inquiry. Under the Act, the Child Welfare Committee has been built up to take into account the requirements of weak children [xiv].

New Act managing Juvenile delinquency came in 2015 where the age of the adolescent was decreased from 18 years to 16 years, that is, any child who has committed any heinous crime under the age of 16 to 18 years will be treated as an adult. The force is comprised of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) to choose whether the adolescent is to be sent to a recovery home or tried as an adult [xv].

CONCLUSION

A child who commits heinous crimes like rape and murder should be tried and offered punishment as adults. Juvenile courts should be tough to ensure juveniles do not take advantage of immunity from prosecution. Juveniles in rehabilitation should also be offered significant psychological help. Children represent the future of tomorrow so should be offered reasonable consideration. Reducing the age of juvenile delinquents from 18 years to 16 years as referenced in Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015 isn’t an answer. The administration should attempt to implement the Act appropriately and they should follow the reformative methodology and attempt to engage juveniles in some skilled work with the goal that they can lead a peaceful life afterwards.

Disclaimer: This article is an original submission of the Author. Niti Manthan does not hold any liability arising out of this article. Kindly refer to our Terms of use or write to us in case of any concerns.

FAQ

Q1. Why Juveniles be tried as Adults?

A1. A juvenile who commits heinous crimes like rape and murder should be tried and offered punishment as adults. Juvenile courts should not be a road to immunity from prosecution.

REFERENCES

[i] Kashish Mathur, Juvenile Delinquency in India Causes and Prevention, <http://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-1724-juvenile-delinquency-in-india-causes-and-prevention-.html> accessed in August 2020.

[ii] Times Reporter, DEBATE: Should courts treat juveniles like adults? April 22, 2016, <https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/199167> accessed in August 2020.

[iii] Anubhav Pandey, Challenges to Juvenile Justice Laws in India, Sept.12, 2018, <https://blog.ipleaders.in/juvenile-justice-2/#_ftnref7> accessed in August 2020.

[iv] Sanjay Suri v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1986 SC 414.

[v] Jayendra v. the State of UP, AIR 1982 SC 685.

[vi] Munna v. the State of UP, AIR 1982 SC 806.

[vii] Bhoop Ram v. the State of UP, AIR 1987 SC 1329.

[viii] Raj Singh v. the State of Haryana, 2000 (6) SCC 759.

[ix] Article 15 (3) of the Constitution of India.

[x] Article 39 (f) of the Constitution of India.

[xi] Section 82, KD Gaur, Textbook on Indian Penal Code, 6th Edition, 2018, Pg.No.-191.

[xii] Section 83, KD Gaur, Textbook on Indian Penal Code, 6th Edition, 2018, Pg.no.-193.

[xiii] Section 27, The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

[xiv] Juvenile Justice (Care And Protection Of Children) Act, 2000.

[xv] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.