Skip navigation

Deepfake And The Possible Threats To One's Identity

Jan. 15, 2024   •   Shreyansh Pandey

Introduction

Deepfake is a term that refers to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) to manipulate media, such as images, videos, and audio, in a way that makes them appear real, even though they are not. Deepfake technology can create realistic images and sounds of people who do not exist or who have never said or done certain things, by using large amounts of data and sophisticated algorithms to learn the features and patterns of the target person. For example, a deepfake video can swap the face of a celebrity onto an adult actress' face, or make a politician say something he or she never said. Deepfake technology can be used for various purposes, such as entertainment, satire, fraud, or propaganda. However, it also poses serious ethical and social challenges, as it can undermine the trust and credibility of information, and harm the reputation and privacy of individuals.

Positive applications

Deepfakes can have some positive aspects also, some of them are:

- Entertainment: Deepfake has the potential to democratize expensive VFX technology. It can also become a powerful tool for independent storytellers at a fraction of the cost. Deepfakes can be used to create realistic scenes in movies, such as bringing back deceased actors or actresses or changing the appearance of characters. Deepfakes can also be used for comedy or parody, by making celebrities or politicians say or do funny things.

- Education: Deepfakes can assist teachers in delivering engaging lessons, by bringing historical figures to life in the classroom, or creating interactive simulations of different scenarios. Deepfakes can also help students learn from the masters of their fields, by generating realistic lectures or demonstrations from experts or celebrities.

- Art: Deepfakes can be a form of artistic expression, by allowing creators to experiment with different styles, genres, and media. Deepfakes can also be used to generate novel and original content, such as music, poetry, or paintings, by using AI to mimic or remix the works of famous artists.

- Activism: Deepfakes can be a way of raising awareness or promoting social causes, by creating persuasive or emotional messages that can reach a wider audience. Deepfakes can also be used to protect the identity or privacy of activists, whistleblowers, or victims, by disguising their faces or voices.

Deepfake technology can enhance the quality and accessibility of media content, by making it more realistic, immersive, and personalized. Deepfake technology can also make media content more affordable, diverse, and inclusive, by reducing the costs, barriers, and biases involved in its production and distribution.

Serious ethical and social challenges and risks

Deepfake technology is a form of artificial intelligence that can manipulate images, videos, and audio to create realistic but fake representations of people and events. While this technology can have positive and creative applications, such as entertainment, education, and art, it also poses serious ethical and social challenges and risks, such as creating fake news, spreading misinformation, violating privacy, and harming reputation, and how it can be used for scams, hoaxes, extortion, election manipulation, social engineering, identity theft, and financial fraud. Moreover, the existing and proposed legal and regulatory frameworks for dealing with deepfake technology, such as the IT Act, 2000 and IT Rules in India, face various challenges in enforcing them across different jurisdictions and platforms.

One of the main ethical and social challenges and risks of deepfake technology is that it can create fake news, spread misinformation, violate privacy, and harm reputation, by altering or fabricating what people say or do. This can undermine trust, democracy, security, and human dignity, as well as cause emotional and psychological distress to the victims and the public. For example, in 2018, a deepfake video of former US President Barack Obama was circulated online, in which he appeared to insult his successor Donald Trump. The video was intended to demonstrate the dangers of deepfake technology, but it also showed how easily it can be used to manipulate public opinion and influence political outcomes. Similarly, in 2019, a deepfake video of Indian journalist Rana Ayyub was posted on a pornographic website, in which she was depicted as engaging in sexual acts. The video was a form of revenge porn, aimed at defaming and harassing her for her critical views on the government. These examples illustrate the potential impacts of deepfake technology on democracy, trust, security, and human dignity, as well as the need for ethical and social awareness and responsibility among the creators and consumers of deepfake content.

Another ethical and social challenge and risk of deepfake technology is that it can be used for scams, hoaxes, extortion, election manipulation, social engineering, identity theft, and financial fraud, by impersonating, deceiving, or blackmailing individuals or organizations. For instance, in 2019, a UK-based energy company was tricked into transferring $243,000 to a fraudster, who used deepfake technology to mimic the voice of the company's CEO. The fraudster called the company's managing director and instructed him to make an urgent payment to a Hungarian supplier, claiming that it was a confidential and time-sensitive matter. The managing director did not suspect anything, as the voice sounded exactly like the CEO's. This case demonstrates how deepfake technology can be used to exploit the trust and authority of individuals and organizations and cause significant financial losses and damages.

Existing and proposed legal framework

The existing and proposed legal and regulatory frameworks for dealing with deepfake technology in India are the IT Act, of 2000, and the IT Rules, which aim to prevent and punish cybercrimes, protect data privacy, and regulate online content. However, these laws and regulations face various challenges in enforcing them across different jurisdictions and platforms, as well as balancing the rights and interests of different stakeholders. For example, the IT Act, of 2000 does not explicitly define or prohibit deepfake technology, and its provisions are vague and broad, which may lead to arbitrary and inconsistent interpretation and application. Moreover, the IT Rules, which require intermediaries to remove or disable access to unlawful content, may infringe on the freedom of expression and information of the users, as well as create a chilling effect on the innovation and development of deepfake technology. Furthermore, the IT Act, 2000 and the IT Rules may not be effective in dealing with cross-border and multi-platform deepfake issues, as they may conflict with the laws and regulations of other countries and platforms, or face difficulties in identifying and locating the offenders and the evidence.

The IT Act, of 2000 is the primary legislation that governs the use of information technology and electronic communication in India. It aims to prevent and punish cybercrimes, protect data privacy, and regulate online content. However, the IT Act, of 2000 does not explicitly define or prohibit deepfake technology, and its provisions are vague and broad, which may lead to arbitrary and inconsistent interpretation and application. For example, Section 66E of the IT Act, 2000 penalizes the violation of privacy by capturing, publishing, or transmitting the image of a person without their consent, but it does not specify whether this applies to deepfake images or videos that are generated without the person's knowledge or involvement. Similarly, Section 66D of the IT Act, 2000 punishes the impersonation of another person by using a computer resource or a communication device, but it does not clarify whether this covers deepfake audio or video that mimics the voice or appearance of another person. Moreover, the IT Act, of 2000 does not address the issues of consent, attribution, and liability that arise from the creation and distribution of deepfake content, nor does it provide any remedies or compensation for the victims of deepfake harm.

The IT Rules are the subordinate legislation that supplements the IT Act, of 2000, and provide the details and procedures for its implementation. The IT Rules include the Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code Rules, 2021, which require intermediaries, such as social media platforms, to remove or disable access to unlawful content, such as deepfake content, within 36 hours of receiving a complaint or a court order. However, the IT Rules also face various challenges in enforcing them across different jurisdictions and platforms, as well as balancing the rights and interests of different stakeholders. For instance, the IT Rules may infringe on the freedom of expression and information of the users, as well as create a chilling effect on the innovation and development of deepfake technology, by imposing excessive restrictions and obligations on the intermediaries and the creators of deepfake content. Furthermore, the IT Rules may not be effective in dealing with cross-border and multi-platform deepfake issues, as they may conflict with the laws and regulations of other countries and platforms, or face difficulties in identifying and locating the offenders and the evidence.

Therefore, some possible solutions to improve the legal and regulatory frameworks for dealing with deepfake technology in India are as follows: First, there is a need for a clear and comprehensive definition of deepfake technology and its uses and abuses, as well as a specific and proportionate prohibition and penalty for deepfake offenses, in the IT Act, 2000 or separate legislation. Second, there is a need for a robust and transparent mechanism for the detection and verification of deepfake content, as well as the reporting and redressal of deepfake complaints, involving the collaboration and coordination of the government, the industry, the academia, and the civil society. Third, there is a need for a harmonized and consistent approach to the regulation of deepfake technology, taking into account the international best practices and standards, as well as the local context and culture.

Deepfake technology is a double-edged sword that requires careful and responsible use and regulation. It can have positive and creative applications, but it also poses serious ethical and social challenges and risks, such as creating fake news, spreading misinformation, violating privacy, and harming reputation, and how it can be used for scams, hoaxes, extortion, election manipulation, social engineering, identity theft, and financial fraud. Moreover, the existing and proposed legal and regulatory frameworks for dealing with deepfake technology in India, such as the IT Act, 2000 and the IT Rules, face various challenges in enforcing them across different jurisdictions and platforms. Therefore, this essay suggested some possible solutions, such as a clear and comprehensive definition, a robust and transparent mechanism, and a harmonized and consistent approach, to address these issues and ensure the legal and regulatory implications of deepfake technology are properly managed and mitigated.

Possible solutions and best practices

some possible solutions to address the risks of deep fake technology are as follows:

First, there is a need for more education and awareness among the public and the media about the nature and implications of deepfake technology, as well as the ways to detect and verify deepfake content, such as using digital watermarking, blockchain, or reverse image search.

Second, there is a need for more collaboration and coordination among the government, industry, academia, and civil society, to develop and implement ethical and social norms and standards, as well as legal and regulatory frameworks, for the responsible and accountable use and regulation of deepfake technology, such as adopting a self-regulatory or co-regulatory approach, or creating a dedicated authority or agency to oversee and enforce deepfake issues.

Third, there is a need for more research and innovation in the field of deepfake technology, to explore its positive and creative potential, as well as to improve its quality and accuracy, so that it can be used for beneficial and legitimate purposes, such as entertainment, education, and art.

Fourth, There is a need to establish technical standards and guidelines for the creation and distribution of synthetic media, such as watermarking, metadata, or digital signatures, to indicate the source and authenticity of the content. There is also a need to develop and deploy robust AI-powered detection tools, such as FakeNet.AI, that can analyze the features and patterns of the media and identify the anomalies or inconsistencies that indicate manipulation.

Fifth, There is a need to educate and empower the public to be critical and vigilant consumers and producers of media content, and to develop the skills and knowledge to discern and verify the credibility and accuracy of the information. There is also a need to raise awareness and promote the ethical and responsible use of deepfake technology and to discourage and condemn its misuse for malicious purposes.

Sixth, There is a need to foster a culture of transparency and accountability among the media industry and platforms and to encourage them to adopt and enforce ethical and professional standards and codes of conduct for the creation and dissemination of synthetic media. There is also a need to support and collaborate with independent and credible fact-checkers and watchdogs, such as ISACA, that can monitor and expose cases of deepfake misuse and provide reliable and accurate information to the public.

Seventh, There is a need to provide and facilitate easy and accessible ways for users to verify and report the suspicious or fraudulent content they encounter online, such as using reverse image or video search, contacting the source or author, or using online tools or platforms that can help detect or flag deepfakes, such as Cato Networks. There is also a need to reward and incentivize users who contribute to the prevention and detection of deepfake technology and to penalize and deter users who engage in or support its misuse. etc

References:

(1) How to Protect Against Deepfake Attacks and Extortion. https://securityintelligence.com/articles/how-protect-against-deepfake-attacks-extortion/.

(2) Deep Fake Generation and Detection: Issues, Challenges, and Solutions .... https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10077834/.

(3) The Role of Deepfake Technology in the Landscape of ... - ISACA. https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/isaca-now-blog/2023/the-role-of-deepfake-technology-in-the-landscape-of-misinformation-and-cybersecurity-threats.

(4) Understanding Deepfake Technology: How it Works and Its Pros & Cons. https://pctechmag.com/2023/05/understanding-deepfake-technology/.

(5) undefined. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=6294.

(6) What Are Deepfakes: Definition, Meaning, Technology, Types, & Examples. https://www.scienceabc.com/innovation/what-is-deepfake-technology.html.

(7) What are deepfakes – and how can you spot them? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jan/13/what-are-deepfakes-and-how-can-you-spot-them.

(8) DEEPFAKE | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/deepfake.

(9) DEEPFAKE Definition & Usage Examples | Dictionary.com. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/deepfake.

(10) Advantages and Disadvantages of Deepfake Technology. https://medium.com/geekculture/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-deepfake-technology-ccfa7c12b1ae.

(11) Applications of Deepfake Technology: Its Benefits and Threats. https://www.knowledgenile.com/blogs/applications-of-deepfake-technology-positives-and-dangers.

(12) What Are The Positive Applications of Deepfakes? - Jumpstart Magazine. https://www.jumpstartmag.com/what-are-the-positive-applications-of-deepfakes/.

(13) Here's how deepfake technology can be a good thing. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/11/advantages-of-artificial-intelligence/.

(14) undefined. https://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-deepfake.

(15) undefined. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PZ3W1W20bk&t=27s&ab_channel=DeepFakesClub.

(16) Deepfakes: Opportunities, Threats, and Regulation. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-editorials/deepfakes-opportunities-threats-and-regulation.

(17) Ethical Considerations of Deepfakes - Prindle Institute. https://www.prindleinstitute.org/2020/12/ethical-considerations-of-deepfakes/.

(18) Deceptive Tech: The Ethics of Deepfakes | OriginStamp. https://originstamp.com/blog/deceptive-tech-the-ethics-of-deepfakes/.

(19) The legal implications and challenges of deepfakes - DAC Beachcroft. https://www.dacbeachcroft.com/en/gb/articles/2020/september/the-legal-implications-and-challenges-of-deepfakes/.

(20) The Distinct Wrong of Deepfakes | Philosophy & Technology - Springer. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-021-00459-2.

(21) Regulating deepfakes and generative AI in India | Explained. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/regulating-deepfakes-generative-ai-in-india-explained/article67591640.ece.

(22) The deepfake dilemma: Detection and decree - Bar and Bench. https://www.barandbench.com/columns/deepfake-dilemma-detection-and-desirability.

(23) Deepfake Technology in India: Legal Provisions, Challenges, and Future .... https://bnnbreaking.com/tech/cybersecurity/deepfake-technology-in-india-legal-provisions-challenges-and-future-imperatives/.

(24) DEEPFAKES & IT'S LEGAL IMPLICATIONS IN INDIA. https://lawfoyer.in/deepfakes-legal-implications-in-india/.

(25) The deepfake dilemma: Detection and decree - Bar and Bench. https://www.barandbench.com/columns/deepfake-dilemma-detection-and-desirability.

(26) Regulating deepfakes and generative AI in India | Explained. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/regulating-deepfakes-generative-ai-in-india-explained/article67591640.ece.

(27) Deepfakes in India: Regulation and Privacy | South Asia@LSE. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/southasia/2020/05/21/deepfakes-in-india-regulation-and-privacy/.

(28) South Asia @ LSE: Deepfakes in India: Regulation and Privacy. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/104926/1/southasia_2020_05_21_deepfakes_in_india_regulation_and.pdf.

Disclaimer: The author affirms that this article is an entirely original work, never before submitted for publication at any journal, blog, or other publication avenue. Any unintentional resemblance to previously published material is purely coincidental. This article is intended solely for academic and scholarly discussion. The author takes personal responsibility for any potential infringement of intellectual property rights belonging to any individuals, organizations, governments, or institutions.


Liked the article ?
Share this: