Skip navigation

Contracts governing 'Doctor-Patient relationships'

Feb. 21, 2024   •   Vivek Meher


In India, the regulatory framework governing the convergence of medicine and law is known as medico-legal legislation. Its purpose is to uphold professional obligations, patient rights, and ethical standards in the healthcare industry. These legal statutes function as a beacon of guidance, outlining the responsibilities and entitlements of healthcare professionals, patients, and regulatory authorities. The medico-legal environment in India is based on a wide range of laws covering different aspects of patient rights and healthcare delivery. The cornerstone legislation is the Consumer Protection Act of 2019, which addresses medical negligence and consumer rights in healthcare services, and the Indian Medical Council Act of 1956, which governs medical education and professional behaviour.

This article will deal with confidentiality in the doctor- patient relationship, Confidentiality is the foundational concept that protects the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship. The cornerstone that promotes confidence, permits open conversation, and guarantees the wellbeing of people seeking medical attention is this ethical and legal commitment.


Based on the interactions between a doctor and patient, numerous identities exist. Essentially, it is a fiduciary relationship built on trust and good faith on both sides. There is also a legal connection between the two. This addresses the standard of care that physicians are expected to provide, contractual duties, and tortious responsibilities.

The doctor-patient relationship is widely recognized to have three main characteristics from a legal perspective.

1- The first aspect is contractual: a connection is governed by the rules of contract law from the moment it is established.

2- Second, in a consensual relationship, doctors must get competent informed permission from their patients before providing care and treatment.

3- Third, to provide quality assurance, the physician must adhere to the proper standards of care when treating the patient.

Fiduciary law, acknowledges that in some legal situations where one party is more powerful than the other, the more powerful party—in this case, the physician—is held to a higher standard than would be implied by conventional rules of contract or tort law, now applies to doctors.


The doctor-patient connection, which is based on mutual understanding, empathy, and trust, is fundamental to the healthcare system. But recently, contracts have become more important in this relationship, influencing how people and healthcare professionals interact. Healthcare contracts are essential for outlining the rights and obligations of all parties involved. These contracts are frequently in the form of agreements for certain treatments or procedures or informed consent paperwork. These agreements specify the course of care, possible risks, anticipated results, and the patient's permission to receive the suggested medical procedure.

A doctor who violates a patient's contract may be sued by the patient. Both theoretical and practical aspects of a contractual approach to creating a partnership between physician and patient are explored.

The doctor-patient relationship is based on four fundamental contractual presumptions: Both the doctor and the patient have defined responsibilities; the partnership is optional rather than mandated; both parties must be amenable to compromise; and both must gain from the exchanges. Clinical cases are used to illustrate the practical implications of the paradigm. Even if written contracts are not required for all patients, a contractual analysis of doctor-patient interactions helps both parties share the responsibility for patient care.

Ethical Considerations

Contracts are legal instruments that outline duties and expectations, yet ethical issues are nevertheless of utmost importance. Beyond written contracts, an ethical framework governs the doctor-patient relationship. It includes a pledge to behave in the patient's best interest, confidentiality, collaborative decision-making, and respect for the patient's autonomy.

Harmonizing Ethical Principles with Legal Frameworks

It might be difficult to strike a balance between the ethical requirements that come with providing healthcare and the legal requirements of contracts. It is nevertheless essential to make sure that contracts are understandable, respect the patient's autonomy, and adhere to legal standards.

Effect on the relationship

Contracts have the power to strengthen and modify the doctor-patient bond. Patients and healthcare professionals can have greater trust and understanding when contracts are explicit, clear, and respect patient autonomy while encouraging open communication. On the other hand, miscommunication or unclear contractual language could put strain on this fragile partnership.

The subtleties of the doctor-patient relationship and the function of contracts within it change along with healthcare. It will be crucial to advance shared decision-making models, take into account patient preferences, and make sure that contracts reflect changing healthcare practices. The foundation of healthcare is still the doctor-patient relationship, which is based on ethics, empathy, and trust. While contracts define specific areas of care, they should support, not replace, the ethical commitments that form the foundation of this important collaboration. Maintaining the integrity of this connection while guaranteeing patient-centered treatment requires finding a balance between legal frameworks and ethical issues.


Tort law forms the legal backdrop that governs the doctor-patient relationship concerning negligence, malpractice, and liability. Medical malpractice falls under the realm of tort law, encompassing instances where a healthcare professional breaches their duty of care, resulting in harm to the patient.

Duty of Care

The duty of care that healthcare practitioners have to their patients is established by tort law. A specific degree of care is required of doctors based on their training and the accepted medical conventions. If there is a deviation from this standard that causes harm to the patient, only then could any legal consequences arise.

Negligence and Liability

In the context of the doctor-patient relationship, negligence refers to a failure to provide reasonable care, resulting in harm. Patients have the right to pursue legal action if they believe they have suffered harm due to a healthcare provider's negligence.

The foundation of healthcare is still the doctor-patient relationship, which is based on respect and trust. While tort law provides a legal framework for handling cases of medical negligence, delivering high-quality healthcare still depends critically on upholding the fundamental principles of this relationship, including empathy, trust, and ethical treatment.


In India, medical-legal rules have a significant impact on how healthcare is provided, patient rights are upheld, and medical personnel are held accountable. Maintaining ethical compliance while allowing for medical innovation is still essential. Fostering a hospital environment based on moral values and patient-centered care requires a thorough awareness of and adherence to these regulations.

The author affirms that this article is an entirely original work, never before submitted for publication at any journal, blog, or other publication avenue. Any unintentional resemblance to previously published material is purely coincidental. This article is intended solely for academic and scholarly discussion. The author takes personal responsibility for any potential infringement of intellectual property rights belonging to any individuals, organizations, governments, or institutions.

Liked the article ?
Share this: