Skip navigation

Broadly Speaking: Patent Rights in India

Jun. 16, 2020   •   Architi Batra

INTRODUCTION

The concept of a patent has been developed in the recent past in India, in the era of technology and competition every country and human being is coming with different approach and manoeuvre. Where they evolve or invent a novel product, this invention is the endeavour of a single individual or group. It belongs to the person who invented or concoct it, a person protects their valuable by keeping the value in safe custody, but the human intellect cannot be kept safe in this way. To protect the creation of individual the Patent law has been introduced which safeguard the right of the inventor, who enjoy exclusive right over the formulation and invention. Without providing royalty to the inventor or their consent the method or idea cannot be used.

Previously to protect their invention person use to keep their invention unrevealed but with the growth of time and technology. This kinds of idea and creation have great value for human community and for the prestige of the country. The patent right introduce to protect the right of that individual.

India has privileged with an abundance of natural resources and human intellect. From the very past India is known for his cultural diversity. India is the country with copious and plentiful natural resources and traditional knowledge over medicine and product which is used for the betterment of the country. As India is the country who believes and greater emphasis upon welfare, as in India there is cultural diversity people possess different method and idea to use the natural resources for medicinal purpose.

Patent Right in India

To promote more invention it is imperative to protect their right and give them honour for the same. To safeguard the right of inventor certain right has been granted to them.

NOT PATENTABLE PROPERTY

The mere discovery of any new property or new use for a known substance, or of the mere use of a known process, which results into a new product, can’t be considered as a patented product. SECTION 3(D) OF THE PATENTS ACT, 1970, prescribes the class of discovery, which cannot be a subject matter of the patent.

In Novartis AG & Ors. V. Union of India & Ors.,(2) The Hon’ble Supreme Court discussed the meaning of the term “Efficacy” in detail. Efficacy means the ability to produce a desired or intended result. The test of efficacy in the context of Section 3 (d), would be varying in respect of product under consideration is desired or intended to produce.

The mere discovery of a scientific principle or formulation of an abstract theory, of any living thing substance occurring in nature can’t be patented. AS PER SECTION 3 (C) OF THE PATENTS ACT, 1970, it becomes very purely interpreted that it can be highly recognized that the mere discovery in regards with the living substance, occurring in nature cannot be patented.

PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES FROM THEFT AND COMMERCIAL EXPLOITATION

Biopiracy is the piracy of various valuable elements in the biosphere or biodiversity. Biopiracy is the plunder of nature and its knowledge. Biopiracy refers to the unauthorized use of biological resources and/or traditional communities’ knowledge of biological resources. (3) The biopiracy cases involving misappropriation and commercial exploitation of traditional knowledge and biogenetic resources. (4) The plant was not their discovery but the knowledge of the tribes that were used for their ultimate advantage. (5) As the process is known from the very long period of the time by the people of that Community inhabiting to the particular area where they were living and producing such medicine by their invention, which cannot be taken up the third party and that too with the similar result of medicine. Fauna and flora in their many beautiful and varied forms are an irreplaceable part of the natural system which must be protected, conscious of the ever-growing value of fauna and flora from aesthetic, scientific and cultural and economic points of view. (6)

As per the concept of traditional knowledge defined by WTO used by the community for curing various flaws will be the ultimate holder of rights as intellectual property. (7) People have known the medical properties of neem for many generations and the curing dermatological diseases in humans and in protecting agricultural plants form fungal infections. Since then, traditional India knowledge is in public. (8)

SUSTAIN THE NATURAL RESOURCE

In order to protect the resource, the state through wildlife life protection, 1972 has the power to declare a land owned by the government to sustain the natural resource after having a consultation with the local communities, particularly the areas adjacent to national parks and sanctuaries and those areas which link one protected area with another, as a conservation reserve for protecting flora and fauna in their habitat. (9) The court gives finding upon the case that using known knowledge or modifying the way of using the product cannot be believed as discovery.

CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

The CBD under the United Nations Environment Programme became effective in 1993 with the objective of conservation of Biological Diversity, sustainable use of its components and fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilization of the genetic resources. (10) The India legal position with respect to the Convention on Biological Diversity, brought up the act came to be known as Biological Diversity Act, 2002, therefore it as it is been regarded that for the access and utilization of any biological resource would require the permission of the National Biodiversity Authority, and the permission is inclusive of obtaining biological resources occurring in India or associated knowledge for –(i) Commercial Utilization, (ii) Bioutilization, (iii) Research, (iv) Applying for intellectual property rights. (11)

CONCLUSION

India is blessed with an abundance of natural resources and has rich knowledge about medicinal plants. Now it is imperative to protect the traditional knowledge which is in practice in a particular region from the ages. The use of turmeric and neem has been introduced in India their medicinal values were identified and exhibit to the world through India. As this knowledge is termed as traditional knowledge. India is the signatory country of the TRIPS agreement and part of many conventions to protect as to protect the intellectual property right of the people. India has explicitly improved the patent law & safeguarding the rights.

[The author Pragya Vaishnav is a 4th-year law student at Indore Institute of Law]

Disclaimer: This article is an original submission of the Author. Niti Manthan does not hold any liability arising out of this article. Kindly refer to our Terms of use or write to us in case of any concerns.


  1. Rai Diva, Patent laws in India: basics you must know, October 16, 2019
  2. 2013 (54) PTC 1 (SC)
  3. Case of misappropriation of traditional knowledge, page 75, para 2
  4. Ibid
  5. KochanKaniKunjuramanKani v. MathevanKani Sankaran Kani, AIR 1971, SC 1398, (1971) 2SCC 345, [1971] Sipp SCR 786
  6. Regional Deputy Director v. Zavaray S. Poonawala and ors., :2015(4)ABR82, 2015IV AD (S.C.) 671, 2016(4) CHN (SC) 236, 2015(5)FLT428, 2015-5-LW585,
  7. 2015(3)RCR(Civil)583,2015(3)RCR(Criminal)172, 2015(5)SCALE184, (2015)7SCC347,
  8. (2016)3WBLR(SC)59.
  9. Annexure-II of the World Trade Organisation, 1999
  10. Case of Neem Patent (Azadiracha Indica) EPO Patent No. 436257
  11. Section 36A (1), Wildlife Protection Act, 1972

Other references

Mathur Vipin “Patenting of Pharmaceuticals: An Indian Perspective”, Int. J. Drug Dev. & Res., July-September 2012, 4(3): 27-34

Contribution to The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, second edition Bronwyn H. Hall September 2006, revised February 2007


Liked the article ?
Share this: